Last week, keynote speaker Mike Robbins asked his LinkedIn audience a simple question about team clarity and the bell curve of engagement: as we move into the second half of the year, what does your team need most?
45% said more clarity.
Not more trust. Not more appreciation. Not better communication.
Clarity.
That number didn’t surprise me. What concerns me, and what most leaders miss entirely, is what happens when clarity is asked for and still doesn’t come.
The Three Stages of Decline Nobody Talks About
When confusion exists inside an organization, there is a predictable sequence that follows. It doesn’t announce itself. It doesn’t show up in a survey. By the time a leader sees it clearly, the damage is already done.
Stage 1: People Begin to Question.
This is the healthy stage, the one most leaders never notice because it looks like engagement. People are still trying. They are asking questions, raising concerns, looking for direction. The questions sound like this: What are we actually trying to accomplish? What does winning look like? How does my work connect to what matters most?
These are not complaints. They are invitations. Invitations to lead.
When those questions are answered with clarity, specific, meaningful, measurable clarity, people move forward with confidence. They are more engaged. They do their best work.
When those questions go unanswered, something shifts.
Stage 2: People Begin to Doubt.
Doubt is quieter than questioning. It doesn’t raise its hand in meetings. It doesn’t send the email. It starts to wonder whether the answers are coming at all, and whether the people in charge actually have them.
Doubt looks like hesitation. Like checking before acting. Like waiting for someone else to go first. Like doing exactly what is asked and nothing more.
At this stage, the 60% who were on the fence, the people who could go either way, start drifting. Not dramatically. Not visibly. Just gradually, in the direction of less.
And if doubt goes unaddressed long enough, you reach the final stage.
Stage 3: People Give Up.
Not loudly. They don’t resign in protest or deliver a manifesto. They simply stop caring whether the organization wins. They show up. They complete tasks. They go through the motions with enough competence to avoid attention.
What Gallup calls active disengagement. What the rest of us recognize as “I’m just going to do my job.”
This is the stage that costs organizations billions annually in lost productivity, missed opportunity, and cultural erosion, and it almost never starts with a bad attitude. It starts with an unanswered question.
The Team Clarity Bell Curve Every Leader Needs to Understand
In any organization, of any size, your people distribute across three groups. Picture a bell-shaped curve.
The Nevers, 20%
On the left of the bell curve. On average, 20% of any team. These are the people who will never contribute meaningfully to what the organization is trying to accomplish. Gallup’s research on this group is stark: they describe these employees as actively damaging to organizational culture, often working to pull others toward disengagement.
Tom Peters, when I worked with him, was direct: “Fire them in an instant. They damage your culture and recruit others to the dark side. Get rid of them and live with the consequences.”
John Kotter took a different approach: assign them to a project far from the action and let them self-select in or out. Either way, he argued, you win.
My advice is somewhere between those two, but the principle both of them share is the one that matters: stop spending your energy here. The Nevers are called the Nevers for a reason.
The Maybes, 60%
In the middle. On average, 60% of any team. They are on the fence. They can drift left toward the Nevers, or they can move right. They are watching. They are waiting. They are asking, consciously or not, whether this organization and its leaders are worth giving their best to.
This is where all of your opportunity lives.
The Models, 20%
On the right. On average, 20% of any team. The people who will walk on broken glass for you. Who dive in when a new strategy is announced. Who don’t need to be convinced, managed, or motivated, they need to be pointed at a clear target and trusted to perform.
Here is what the research tells us: when leaders engage and convert even 5-10% of the Maybes into Models, the impact on organizational performance is exponential. Change accelerates. Strategies execute. Culture shifts, not through mandate, but through momentum.
What Clarity Actually Does to Move the Maybes.
Here is what does not move them: inspirational messaging. Motivational moments. Another all-hands meeting with a new set of slides.
What moves them is clarity.
Specifically: clarity that meets what I call the 3-M Standard. For direction to move people from Maybe to Model, it must be:
- Meaningful, connected to something they care about. The 2-3 highest priority outcomes that move everyone and the entire organization into a better position.
- Measurable, specific enough that they know what winning looks like.
- Memorable, simple enough to carry with them without a slide deck. Not the 30-50 things you measure daily, that show up on your balanced scorecard, or are simply part of your daily ‘whirlwind’ that keeps the lights on.
When those conditions are met, something remarkable happens. The Maybes don’t need to be convinced. They choose.
That is the difference between a “have-to” culture and a “want-to” culture. You create a “pull” versus a “push.” Leaders cannot mandate a want-to culture. They can only create the conditions for one, and those conditions start with clarity.
What This Means for the Second Half of the Year
If 45% of leaders surveyed said their team needs more clarity, and your team is not exempt from that number, the question worth sitting with is this:
Where in your organization are people stuck in Stage 1, quietly waiting for an answer that hasn’t come?
Where are the Maybes drifting left because nobody has given them a compelling reason to move right?
And what would shift if you gave them a clear, measurable, memorable picture of what winning looks like, this quarter, this month, this week?
Clarity is not a soft leadership skill. It is the mechanism that converts doubt into direction, hesitation into commitment, and maybes into models.
In a world where AI is reshaping what organizations can accomplish, the leaders who provide that clarity will pull away from the ones who don’t. The timeline on that separation is getting shorter.
The team clarity bell curve is not a theory, it is what your workforce looks like right now.
The Team Clarity Bell Curve — Your Next Step
Those prepared need not fear the forces at work.
Read the full article here, on LinkedIn
Want to know where your organization stands? The Kryptonite Scorecard measures your readiness across all five ingredients, including Leadership at All Levels, in less than 10 minutes.
Distinct or Extinct: Future-Proofing People and Organizations in the Age of AI is now available on Amazon.